Choose a connection path based on your exit region, route topology, and target service. QPVPN covers 90+ countries and 200+ routes, with IEPL, relay, and direct connections available.
Use the table to confirm the exit region, city, and route structure; temporary speed-test results are not shown. City names identify the area where the route exits. Streaming support means the route can be used to match the corresponding regional service, but availability still depends on the platform account region, content rights, and platform policies.
APAC
Asia-Pacific Routes
Suitable for content and online services in Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Australia, India, and nearby regions. When the target service is in Asia, start by testing a route in the same or a nearby region.
Country/Region
City
Route Type
Streaming
Japan
Tokyo
IEPL
Supported
Japan
Osaka
Relay
Supported
South Korea
Seoul
Relay
Supported
Singapore
Singapore
IEPL
Supported
Hong Kong, China
Hong Kong
IEPL
Supported
Taiwan, China
Taipei
Relay
Supported
Australia
Sydney
Direct
Supported
India
Mumbai
Direct
Supported
NORTH AMERICA
North American Routes
For online services in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Match the target platform’s region first, then adjust the route type based on sustained transfer, interactive response, and connection stability.
Country/Region
City
Route Type
Streaming
United States
Los Angeles
IEPL
Supported
United States
San Jose
Relay
Supported
United States
New York
Direct
Supported
Canada
Toronto
Direct
Supported
Canada
Vancouver
Relay
Supported
Mexico
Mexico City
Direct
Supported
EUROPE
European Routes
For services in the United Kingdom, Germany, France, the Netherlands, Sweden, Italy, and nearby regions. When a European platform has specific regional requirements, choose an exit that matches the account region and content area.
Country/Region
City
Route Type
Streaming
United Kingdom
London
Relay
Supported
Germany
Frankfurt
IEPL
Supported
France
Paris
Relay
Supported
Netherlands
Amsterdam
Direct
Supported
Sweden
Stockholm
Direct
Supported
Italy
Milan
Direct
Supported
OTHER REGIONS
Other Regions
Representative exits in South America, Africa, and the Middle East. Long-distance connections are more affected by cross-regional paths and local network conditions, so match the target region first and keep a nearby region as a backup.
Country/Region
City
Route Type
Streaming
Brazil
São Paulo
Direct
Supported
Argentina
Buenos Aires
Direct
Supported
South Africa
Johannesburg
Direct
Supported
United Arab Emirates
Dubai
Relay
Supported
TOPOLOGY
How Route Types Differ
Route names describe how data is organized between your local network and the exit server. They do not represent a fixed speed and cannot be judged apart from your location, local provider, access time, and target service. A more reliable approach is to understand the topology first, then choose based on the task.
IEPL
PRIVATE PATH
IEPL: A More Concentrated Path
IEPL organizes cross-border traffic over a relatively independent link with less reliance on public-internet routing. Its value is not a higher peak in a single speed test, but fewer path changes and more consistent sustained transfers. For long meetings, remote desktops, continuous uploads and downloads, and high-bitrate streaming, this stability is often more useful than a brief speed spike.
Dedicated-route resources cost more to build and maintain, so they are generally prioritized for areas with concentrated demand, frequent access, or greater sensitivity to fluctuations. The exit must still match the destination: for a service in Japan, compare Japanese IEPL routes first; for Germany, prioritize a German or nearby European exit rather than choosing across regions based only on the “IEPL” label.
Suitable use cases include sustained office work, video meetings, remote collaboration, long transfers, and viewing tasks that are sensitive to buffering. If your local network is unstable, an IEPL route cannot replace local troubleshooting; first check the wireless connection, router, and local provider path.
TRANSIT
RELAY PATH
Relay Routes: Reorganizing the Path Between Entry and Exit
A relay route first connects to a suitable access point, then sends traffic through a relay node to the target exit. This can avoid poor default routes between the local network and a distant data center while splitting a volatile long-distance public-internet path into manageable sections. For Japan, South Korea, Singapore, the western United States, and major European cities, relays often balance coverage and connection quality.
A relay adds one path-management step compared with a direct connection. Its resource cost is usually higher than a standard direct route but lower than an IEPL route. It suits everyday browsing, AI tools, streaming, and remote work, making it a sensible starting point without a specific requirement. When several relay exits are available in one region, consider page loading, sustained playback, and interactive responsiveness—not just the city name.
Relay performance depends partly on the entry point. After moving to another network, switching local providers, or changing location, a previously suitable relay may no longer be the best choice. When the connection changes, switching to another relay within the same exit region usually makes more sense than jumping directly to a distant country.
DIRECT
PUBLIC PATH
Direct Routes: Simple Structure, Flexible Coverage
A direct route connects the local network to the exit server without an intermediate relay. Its structure is simpler and makes it practical to cover more countries and cities. It suits clear destinations, shorter distances, and situations where the default public route is reliable. For regional websites, market-specific pages, and short research sessions, direct routes offer a clear, straightforward exit choice.
Direct routes generally require fewer resources, allowing coverage to extend to more non-core regions. The trade-off is greater reliance on public routing, so performance can change when cross-regional paths shift or networks become congested. The point is not to treat direct routes as inferior, but to use them for the right task: when a specific country is required, a direct route in that region may be more suitable than a distant IEPL route.
If a direct route completes the task reliably, there is no need to switch to a more complex structure just because of its name. Judge the route by the result: consistent page response, stable file transfers, sustained video quality, and recognition of the correct region by the target service.
USE CASE
Choose an Exit and Route by Use Case
There is no single route that is always best. Different tasks require different exit regions, connection continuity, and interactive response. Identify the destination first, then compare route types to avoid aimless switching.
Everyday Browsing
Everyday access to international websites involves many short connections, such as opening pages, loading images, syncing documents, and researching information. Start with a nearby relay or direct route, then watch whether page elements load consistently, internal navigation responds promptly, and the connection remains stable over longer sessions.
If the target site has no strict regional requirement, avoid switching frequently between countries. Keeping a relatively consistent exit can reduce repeated regional checks or login protection triggers. Switch to the relevant country or city only when a specific regional page is required.
Streaming
For streaming, match the content region first, then consider the route structure. Choose a Japan exit for Japanese content, a United States exit for US content, and the relevant European route for European services. If the exit region does not match, a smooth connection may still show a different content catalog.
High-quality playback depends more on sustained transfer than on a brief peak. Start with an IEPL or relay route in the relevant region, then check whether quality remains stable and playback recovers normally after seeking. Account region, payment region, and copyright policies are determined by the platform; route support does not mean every account sees the same content.
AI Tools
AI tools involve both web interaction and potentially sustained transfers of context, file uploads, or longer generated content. Consider entry response and session continuity together. Usually start with a relay in the service’s commonly supported region; for ongoing document, code, or image work, compare IEPL performance in the same region.
Some AI services assess account region, payment details, access region, and service availability together. Keeping the exit region consistent is generally better for maintaining a session than switching frequently between countries. If a page opens but a feature is unavailable, check the service’s regional policy and account status before changing routes.
Online Gaming
Game connections are more sensitive to path continuity and jitter, but the most distant or resource-intensive route is not necessarily the best choice. Confirm the game server’s region first, then choose an exit nearby. For Asian servers, compare Japan, South Korea, Singapore, or Hong Kong routes; for North American servers, start with the western United States or the relevant area.
Game updates and live play can use different routes. Updates favor sustained downloads, while gameplay depends more on interactive stability. If the client supports per-app or task-based routing, test them separately; otherwise, choose a relay or IEPL route that balances both downloads and gameplay.
Remote Work
Remote work often combines video meetings, collaborative documents, business dashboards, code repositories, and file transfers. Prioritize consistent long-lived connections. If the target system is in a fixed region, choose an IEPL or relay route there; if team services span several regions, base the primary exit on the system used most often or most critical to work continuity.
Avoid switching routes during an important meeting or transfer. A safer approach is to validate the connection before starting and prepare a backup in the same region. After switching, confirm the enterprise login, remote desktop session, and file synchronization are working normally.
SELECTION METHOD
Start with the Target Region, Not the Route Name
Route type is only one selection factor. A complete decision also considers the target service, local network, task duration, and exit consistency.
Confirm the Target Service’s Regional Requirements
Check which country or region the service serves, which region the account currently belongs to, and whether a specific content area applies. Matching the exit to the target region is usually more important than pursuing a more complex route structure. For general websites without regional requirements, start with a nearby region.
Compare Route Types Within the Same Region
Keep testing within the same exit region to prevent geographic distance from becoming an extra variable. Try a relay first, then compare IEPL or direct routes based on the task. For sustained meetings, remote operations, and high-quality viewing, focus on long-term stability; for research and short visits, simpler routes may be preferable.
Validate with Real Tasks
A single speed test cannot fully represent web interaction, video playback, an AI session, or a remote desktop. Open the service you plan to use and complete login, page navigation, content loading, and sustained actions. If the task completes reliably, there is no need to switch repeatedly over brief speed-test differences.
Keep a Backup in the Same Region
Keep the backup route in the same exit region whenever possible to avoid content-region changes or account checks after switching. If the primary route is IEPL, keep a relay in the same region as backup; if it is direct, prepare a nearby city or relay exit.
OPERATING NOTES
Troubleshooting Order for Connection Changes
When a previously reliable route changes, follow a fixed checklist to distinguish local-network issues, exit-route issues, and target-service rules instead of changing too many conditions at once.
Check Whether the Local Network Is Stable
First check whether the current network can open commonly used pages and whether the wireless signal, router, and local provider connection have changed noticeably. If all routes are affected at once, the issue is more likely on the local access side than with a specific exit. Restore the local connection before comparing international routes.
Keep the Exit Region and Switch Routes
If only a specific task is affected, switch route types within the same country or region first. For example, replace a Tokyo relay with a Tokyo IEPL route or an Osaka relay instead of switching directly to a European exit. This preserves the target-region condition and narrows the scope of the issue.
Check the Target Service and Account Region
The target platform may change its content regions, login policies, or service availability. An unusable page does not necessarily indicate a route problem; it may relate to the account region, payment region, app cache, or the platform’s own status. Keep the exit stable while signing in again, refreshing the app state, and checking the platform’s public service information.
Do Not Treat Brief Fluctuations as Long-Term Conclusions
Cross-regional connections pass through multiple network segments, so a short-term change does not represent long-term route performance. Test the complete real task—for example, from joining a meeting through ending the call, from starting playback through changing quality, or from opening an AI tool through completing a longer interaction. Judge whether the task can continue reliably, not a single momentary result.
QPVPN supports Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, and Linux, with unlimited concurrent devices. No email address is required; access can be set up with a username and password. To compare subscription allowances and data packages, visit the Plans page for the full rules. Monthly subscription traffic resets each month on the activation date; data packages remain available until used and never expire. A 30-day, no-questions-asked refund is also provided.